Loading
Literature reviews with citations you can check. When it can't find a source, it says so.
What it looks like
An example for researchers. The names and numbers are made up, and nothing here is connected to your systems.
It supports the main finding but hasn't been peer reviewed, and one figure doesn't match the paper it cites.
The problem
Literature reviews take weeks. Citations need manual verification. Knowledge scattered across papers, notes, and databases.
Intelligence that finds papers, summarizes with verified citations, and saves everything to your workspace. Every source traceable. Every claim verifiable.
Workflow
From question to a summary with sources you can check.
"Find recent papers on transformer efficiency in edge computing"
Queries academic databases, arXiv, Semantic Scholar
Key findings with citations linked to originals
Verified summary saved to your workspace
Every citation links to the original paper. A source it can't find is said so.
Built for research
Every claim linked to its source. Unverified ones are flagged.
Say which sources count, such as peer-reviewed only.
Every search, every finding, every decision recorded.
Share findings across your research team. Knowledge compounds.
Every finding saved. Every source linked. Every team member informed.
research@billingrails.co